Empirical Evidence Vs Personal Expeience

Lack of "empirical evidence" is probably the main argument of an atheist against existence of God. By empirical evidence, I mean, the kind of proof that can be verified through our five basic senses; sight, hearing, taste, touch and smell.

It is fair to say that all the natural sciences that man has accumulated through ages is derived from and based on empirical experience.  That is to say, the raw data collected and received through our senses are internally processed by our mind and then a rational conclusion is drawn as a fact of life which makes our life easier.   We touch a burning martial, we feel the pain on our hand and it registers in our mind as fact of life that we will avoid our entire life afterwards.

The component of rational processing appears to be more significant in some the branches of our knowledge such as humanities and art.  In philosophy for example, being the most abstract subject to study, we still gather empirical data which often constitute part of the premises based on which we develop a rational argument to come to a conclusion.

The purpose of this post is to show that the nature of  a "personal experience" is in truth not that different from other branches of human's knowledge and it is as credible, except for the fact that  it does not lead to a quantifiable formula just in the same way that all disciplines of Arts and Humanities do not.  To this end, I am going to contrast the nature of "empirical evidence", which leads to empirical science, with "Personal Experience" which  results in faith in the context of a simple experiment of science.

Before that let's check their definitions in Wikipedia.

"Empirical evidence, also known as sense experience, is the knowledge or source of knowledge acquired by means of the senses, particularly by observation and experimentation."


"Personal experience of a human being is the moment-to-moment experience and sensory awareness of internal and external events or a sum of experiences forming an empirical unity such as a period of life."

The credibility of an empirical evidence mainly comes from two claims; firstly, it is said to be verifiable by everyone and secondly it is expected to bear the same results (absolute) in different experiments. We can evaluate these claims in an experiment to verify the effect of heat on the length of a piece of metal bar or a metal stick with a known length.

Simply, imagine we heat our metal piece for 10 minutes and then measure its length with a precise instrument suitable for the length we are measuring. The exact details don't really matter for our argument. We already know that it is going to be longer as a result of expansion by heat as a matter of basic scientific fact.
Scrutinizing this simple experiment, we ask;

1- Can anyone do this experiment with an accuracy that would meet the basic scientific standards? The answer is definitely no.  You need to have some basic qualifications in order to be able to perform this experiment.  Namely, you are required to know of how to work with the lab equipment and how to read the measuring devices. 

2- Is the result, that is the length of the expansion of the metal piece, absolutely the same for different experiments by different people? The answer again is negative. They vary within a scientifically defined uncertainty limits.   That is to say, the empirical evidence will show an expansion of length by 5 mm +/- 2% for every 1000 mm length of certain metal nature if heated up by 20 deg, for example. 

3- Is the scientific conclusion of "heat increases the size of a metals" merely based on empirical data? Not really. There is a rational mental process involved which is done in our mind to conclude such a relationship between the heat and enlargement of a metallic object.


This leads us to believe that the main reason we accept an empirical experiment as a fact is essentially because of the general consensus of people having the same experience, which forms a general understanding of how a natural phenomena works and how we can manipulate it to our advantage with some anticipated uncertainty.   

By the same reasoning, I would argue that if different people have similar "personal experiences" on the same subject, the consensus of their rationally processed conclusion is inevitably as credible as a scientific fact supported by "empirical evidence".   By the way of example, if there are many people who claim that when they lie they feel bad and their consensus is lying has negative impact on satisfaction of life then this constitutes a fact of life derived from "personal experience".

Therefore, I would like to conclude that if there is a general consensus by a number of people who have come to a rational conclusion that certain events in their life lead them to believe in God who is running the world at every moment, this can be as credible as a scientific fact.  Hence, it can not be dismissed as a source of human knowledge on the ground that it is derived from "personal experience" rather than "empirical experiment." .

As a matter of fact, faith in its essence is a rational conclusion (reasoning) in light of a collection of empirical data. We observe the world through our senses and the only hypothesis which make sense to us is that there has to be a creator. Therefore, the general consensus on this conclusion is the true sufficient condition for God to exist.

Needless to say, Everyone has the choice to deny all the scientific understandings of the world and to live a life of stone age style depriving themselves from the joys of a modern life. Likewise, it can be can be argued that ignoring the metaphysical nature of the world and the way things work may degrade the quality of our life substantially.

Last but not least, is to acknowledge the fact that the scientific grasp of the world, that is only applicable to nature, usually results in a law of a mathematical nature which helps us quantify the effect of the certain changes with respect to the natural status of things. This is while the in case of the metaphysical laws derived from "personal experience" we can not quantity their effect by some mathematical formula. For example, we can not say how much lie you have to say in order to feel so bad that you would feel so sick that you won't be able to go to work. The same is true about most of the disciplines of arts and humanities. Yet they are indispensable branches of human knowledge.

Quran As a Collection of Evidence That Is Revealed Over Time

There are verses in Quran which must have been barely comprehensible until the modern age when we are equipped with the required knowledge and the technology to explore the world and make sense of the natural phenomena.

The following are a few examples:

بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيم

الشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ بِحُسْبَانٍ

55:5
"The sun and the moon [move] by precise calculation."

14:33

وَسَخَّرَ لَكُمُ الشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ دَائِبَيْنِ ۖ وَسَخَّرَ لَكُمُ اللَّيْلَ وَالنَّهَارَ

"And He subjected for you the sun and the moon, continuous [in orbit], and subjected for you the night and the day."

25:53

وَهُوَ الَّذِي مَرَجَ الْبَحْرَيْنِ هَٰذَا عَذْبٌ فُرَاتٌ وَهَٰذَا مِلْحٌ أُجَاجٌ وَجَعَلَ بَيْنَهُمَا بَرْزَخًا وَحِجْرًا مَّحْجُورًا

"And it is He who has released [simultaneously] the two seas, one fresh and sweet and one salty and bitter, and He placed between them a barrier and prohibiting partition."
55:19-20

مَرَجَ الْبَحْرَيْنِ يَلْتَقِيَانِ

"He released the two seas, meeting [side by side];"

بَيْنَهُمَا بَرْزَخٌ لَّا يَبْغِيَانِ

"Between them is a barrier [so] neither of them transgresses."

صدق الله العلي العظيم

Quran quotes and translations from Quran.com


And the following two videos can be regarded as a contemporary take on what the above verses of Quran mean today.

https://youtu.be/VEA_mknada0  Earth Without Moon - Full Documentary 2016 - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUAQy14g0Qc   The Seas not mixing with each other ┇ Quran and Modern Science ┇ IslamSearch.org - YouTube

Considering the fact that it is highly unlikely that people of 1400 years ago could understand such verses to the degree that we can today, by the way of extrapolation we can come to the conclusion that the verses of Quran that seem incomprehensible at our time may be perfectly understood in future. The numerous verses of Quran about "Jinn"  might be good examples of such cases.

This means that in case of verses whose true meaning are apparently hard to grasp at our time, we can not jump to the conclusion that they are meant metaphorically.  Evidently, when human's perception of the world is evolved enough, their true application/meaning will be unveiled to us.

The miraculous nature of Quran is revealed to us as "Personal Experience or Empirical Evidence" which will follow next.

Quranic View About Time in afterlife ?

  While the word "day" has been used in Quran in numerous occasions, there are only a few verses where time is defined for this world and for the one after.

بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيم

10:5

هُوَ الَّذِي جَعَلَ الشَّمْسَ ضِيَاءً وَالْقَمَرَ نُورًا وَقَدَّرَهُ مَنَازِلَ لِتَعْلَمُوا عَدَدَ السِّنِينَ وَالْحِسَابَ ۚ مَا خَلَقَ اللَّهُ ذَٰلِكَ إِلَّا بِالْحَقِّ ۚ يُفَصِّلُ الْآيَاتِ لِقَوْمٍ يَعْلَمُونَ

"It is He who made the sun a shining light and the moon a derived light and determined for it phases - that you may know the number of years and account [of time]. Allah has not created this except in truth. He details the signs for a people who know." 

32:5

يُدَبِّرُ الْأَمْرَ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ إِلَى الْأَرْضِ ثُمَّ يَعْرُجُ إِلَيْهِ فِي يَوْمٍ كَانَ مِقْدَارُهُ أَلْفَ سَنَةٍ مِّمَّا تَعُدُّونَ

"He arranges [each] matter from the heaven to the earth; then it will ascend to Him in a Day, the extent of which is a thousand years of those which you count."

22:47

وَيَسْتَعْجِلُونَكَ بِالْعَذَابِ وَلَن يُخْلِفَ اللَّهُ وَعْدَهُ ۚ وَإِنَّ يَوْمًا عِندَ رَبِّكَ كَأَلْفِ سَنَةٍ مِّمَّا تَعُدُّونَ

"And they urge you to hasten the punishment. But Allah will never fail in His promise. And indeed, a day with your Lord is like a thousand years of those which you count."

70:4

تَعْرُجُ الْمَلَائِكَةُ وَالرُّوحُ إِلَيْهِ فِي يَوْمٍ كَانَ مِقْدَارُهُ خَمْسِينَ أَلْفَ سَنَةٍ

"The angels and the Spirit will ascend to Him during a Day the extent of which is fifty thousand years."

صدق الله العلي العظيم

Quran quotes and translations from Quran.com

To begin with, the verse 10:5 explains how majestically the concept of time on earth is created by counting the position of the Sun and the Moon. The other three verses in contrast, introduce a time from God's perspective in comparison with what we know as a day and a year on earth. 

Moreover, these verses suggest that time is, in fact, a byproduct of the specific settings that God has determined for each world.  Therefore, since the settings of our current world, the earthly time based on the movement of the Sun and the Moon, will end when our world ends, then there will be a new standard for time represented by the word "day" which governs the world of afterlife.  This is not to say that the bigger world and the bigger time frame does not exist simultaneously with our solar time. 

Most importantly however, the latter verses prove there will be a concept of time in the afterlife too, which will logically follow that change will still exist in the heavens as time and change are basically interdependent concepts.  This is also consistent with various verses of Quran through which the details of heaven and hell as well as the Resurrection day are pictured.  

We can further learn from Quran that Adam and Eve were living in heaven until they were deceived by Satan. As a result of their sin they were transferred to earth evidently in the same body.  Specific clues in verses such as eating from the tree, clear references to their body parts and what material Adam was created from, would all corroborate this assumption.  Therefore, it follows that the heavens may consist of  the same matter but with different settings. We may call it different laws of nature. 

From another perspective, our spiritual nature requires a constant change, or better say a continuous spiritual elevation just as our body needs food constantly.  This spiritual necessity manifests itself against any repetition which leads to a state of psychological boredom.  I have seen people living in a part of the world, for example, where is famous to be a piece of heaven on earth because of its nice weather, its stunning natural scenery or generally due to its heavenly surroundings but they still get bored by their daily routines and have to travel for a change every now and then.  Complains of mundane chores (lake of excitement of a new experience) is also a well known universal cause for mental frustration which may lead to sever depression.   Perhaps, "necessity of having a new life experience" in the today's culture confirms the same basic spiritual need as part of human nature.  

We can, perhaps, conclude that since we will be revived with the same material body and with the same spiritual nature in afterlife, even residing in heaven for us will not be enjoyable unless it involves some sort of spiritual growth.  Therefore, what we call from earth as "afterlife" may only be another step for us to continue to spiritually develop and get closer to God although each day of the new world is equal to a thousand years as we count on earth. This would also imply that heaven and earth may both be two different path to get to the same ultimate spiritual destination namely God. 

Last but not least, the clarification of time, from heavens' view, can as well explain how God has created the whole universe in 6 days, if that seems too short to us. 

  

Is the Afterlife Resurrection Spiritual or Material?

A number of recent prominent Islamic thinkers believe the resurrection of after life described in Quran is meant to be understood figuratively and not literally. That is, we will come back to life with a spiritual body and our material body will not be restored.

Perhaps this is one of the fundamental questions that all believers may ask God at some point in the evolution of their faith.  That is why, Quran has address this subject as follows:

بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيم

2:260

وَإِذْ قَالَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ رَبِّ أَرِنِي كَيْفَ تُحْيِي الْمَوْتَىٰ ۖ قَالَ أَوَلَمْ تُؤْمِن ۖ قَالَ بَلَىٰ وَلَٰكِن لِّيَطْمَئِنَّ قَلْبِي ۖ قَالَ فَخُذْ أَرْبَعَةً مِّنَ الطَّيْرِ فَصُرْهُنَّ إِلَيْكَ ثُمَّ اجْعَلْ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ جَبَلٍ مِّنْهُنَّ جُزْءًا ثُمَّ ادْعُهُنَّ يَأْتِينَكَ سَعْيًا ۚ وَاعْلَمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ

And [mention] when Abraham said, "My Lord, show me how You give life to the dead." [ Allah ] said, "Have you not believed?" He said, "Yes, but [I ask] only that my heart may be satisfied." [ Allah ] said, "Take four birds and commit them to yourself. Then [after slaughtering them] put on each hill a portion of them; then call them - they will come [flying] to you in haste. And know that Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise."

2:59

أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِي حَاجَّ إِبْرَاهِيمَ فِي رَبِّهِ أَنْ آتَاهُ اللَّهُ الْمُلْكَ إِذْ قَالَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ رَبِّيَ الَّذِي يُحْيِي وَيُمِيتُ قَالَ أَنَا أُحْيِي وَأُمِيتُ ۖ قَالَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ يَأْتِي بِالشَّمْسِ مِنَ الْمَشْرِقِ فَأْتِ بِهَا مِنَ الْمَغْرِبِ فَبُهِتَ الَّذِي كَفَرَ ۗ وَاللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الظَّالِمِينَ

Or [consider such an example] as the one who passed by a township which had fallen into ruin. He said, "How will Allah bring this to life after its death?" So Allah caused him to die for a hundred years; then He revived him. He said, "How long have you remained?" The man said, "I have remained a day or part of a day." He said, "Rather, you have remained one hundred years. Look at your food and your drink; it has not changed with time. And look at your donkey; and We will make you a sign for the people. And look at the bones [of this donkey] - how We raise them and then We cover them with flesh." And when it became clear to him, he said, "I know that Allah is over all things competent."

10:45

وَيَوْمَ يَحْشُرُهُمْ كَأَن لَّمْ يَلْبَثُوا إِلَّا سَاعَةً مِّنَ النَّهَارِ يَتَعَارَفُونَ بَيْنَهُمْ ۚ قَدْ خَسِرَ الَّذِينَ كَذَّبُوا بِلِقَاءِ اللَّهِ وَمَا كَانُوا مُهْتَدِينَ

"And on the Day when He will gather them, [it will be] as if they had not remained [in the world] but an hour of the day, [and] they will know each other. Those will have lost who denied the meeting with Allah and were not guided."

صدق الله العلي العظيم

From Quran.com

According to another verse of Quran God knows what is in our heart We can therefore, understand that the verse 2:260 is directly addressing the same concern of all humans namely how God can revive a dead?  It is not a blasphemy to ask God an honest question as Abraham did. This verse also proves that God will never ignore our doubts and questions if we are really keen to know the answer. We however,  tend to avoid a direct conversation with God, most of us at least.

This is mainly because if we are answered and it becomes clear to us that God has somehow answered us, then it will become our responsibility to either testify the truth or to deny it.  Each choice will bring about huge consequences in our life, which we mostly rather to avoid.  I believe, most of us, can not believe and do not want to believe that every ordinary human can enter a direct conversation with God. Perhaps, that is one of the qualities that make us different from a prophet.

That said, God's answer to our doubt on resurrection clarifies that our material body will be restored with its appearance before death. The verse 2:260 also implies that our body will be revived in a way that it will have full functionality since the revived birds could fly back to Abraham.

God must be a perfect philosopher too as he has also addressed this subject from another perspective. In verse 2:59, a believer who is passing by the remains of an ancient village  asks God how he can revive them.   " So Allah caused him to die for a hundred years; then He revived him. ....." , Which is a beautiful story and self explanatory.

Thirdly, verse 10:45 states that when people are revived after life they recognize each other.  This can only be possible if we are resurrected in our material body that we have lived in over our life on earth where we get to know others. Otherwise we will not be able to identify our acquaintances by their soul.

Lastly, while it is understandable that interpreting the Resurrection day as merely spiritual may be a solution to some apparently incomprehensible descriptions of heaven and hell, it seems clearly contrary to the above mentioned verses of Quran.  Hence reducing resurrection day to only spiritual revival can not be the truth.

Does Quran Instruct to Cut off a Thief's Hand?

بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيم

وَالسَّارِقُ وَالسَّارِقَةُ فَاقْطَعُوا أَيْدِيَهُمَا جَزَاءً بِمَا كَسَبَا نَكَالًا مِنَ اللَّـهِ ۗ وَاللَّـهُ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ

5:38  "the thief, the male and the female, amputate their hands in recompense for what they committed as a deterrent [punishment] from Allah. And Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise.'

فَمَنْ تَابَ مِنْ بَعْدِ ظُلْمِهِ وَأَصْلَحَ فَإِنَّ اللَّـهَ يَتُوبُ عَلَيْهِ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّـهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ

5:39 "But whoever repents after his wrongdoing and reforms, indeed, Allah will turn to him in forgiveness. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful."

                                                                  صدق الله العلي العظيم

The first verse above constitute one of the often heard controversies about Quran as it,  apparently, orders a clearly sever punishment for the crime of theft.  

I should say that I spent quite some time thinking about this verse since it did not make much sense to me to apply one fixed punishment regardless of the scale of the theft. That is to say, it seems that there is no difference between a petty theft or a large size steeling for cutting off the thief's hand, which does not seem reasonable. 

Looking for other situations in Quran where the words "cutting and hand" are used together, we find the verse 12:31 which narrates part of the story of Joseph when the "first lady" of the time is blamed by the other women in the city for seeking to seduce a slave. Defending herself, she invites the women to a room giving each a knife and some fruit. Then she asks Joseph to walk into the room while the women were peeling their fruits and this is what happens:

فَلَمَّا سَمِعَتْ بِمَكْرِهِنَّ أَرْسَلَتْ إِلَيْهِنَّ وَأَعْتَدَتْ لَهُنَّ مُتَّكَأً وَآتَتْ كُلَّ وَاحِدَةٍ مِّنْهُنَّ سِكِّينًا وَقَالَتِ اخْرُجْ عَلَيْهِنَّ ۖ فَلَمَّا رَأَيْنَهُ أَكْبَرْنَهُ وَقَطَّعْنَ أَيْدِيَهُنَّ وَقُلْنَ حَاشَ لِلَّهِ مَا هَٰذَا بَشَرًا إِنْ هَٰذَا إِلَّا مَلَكٌ كَرِيمٌ

"So when she heard of their scheming, she sent for them and prepared for them a banquet and gave each one of them a knife and said [to Joseph], "Come out before them." And when they saw him, they greatly admired him and cut their hands and said, "Perfect is Allah ! This is not a man; this is none but a noble angel."

Skipping all the lessons that the beautiful story of Joseph entails, the context of this verse can define the phrase "cutting their hand".  That is cutting the skin of their finger or of their hand as it is the only conceivable event that may happen to any one using a knife in a similar situation.

It however, can be equally argued that in verse 5:33 the same combination of words has been used in a very different context of a battle field, where it could most likely be understood as cutting off a hand or a leg of those who fight against God or his messenger in a war.

Based on these two verses (12:31 & 5:33), I acknowledge the fact that the phrase "cutting hand" can have both meanings, inferring from the two situations discussed.  That is, it can mean cutting the skin of a finger or it can also mean cutting off a whole finger/ hand. Particularly because it is mentioned as a punishment for what a thief has acquired.  Therefore, we can not apply this verse if we only consider this phrase semantically.

Perhaps what can shed light on this case, is paying attention to the absence of any scale for this punishment, bearing in mind that God commandments are to save lives and are to elevate our way of life. That is to say, logically it makes no sense to have the same punishment for a petty theft and for a large scale steeling, embezzling a large some of money for example.  Hence, it is sensible to assume that we can only apply this punishment for the largest scale of steeling for which in many countries currently death penalty is given.

From this perspective, this verse 12:31 is actually setting up the most severe punishment for the crime of theft as opposed to being their first penalty.  There have been many people in recent years (or perhaps at all times) who were sentenced to death because of the huge amounts of money that they took from government or from the so called "public money"  while Quran is telling us the penalty for theft with largest scale of anytime is cutting off a hand not death penalty.   I have no doubt those who lost their lives because of their monetary crimes would have been more than happy if they had lost a finger or a hand instead.

I believe, in this way the verse 12:31 not only will save life but it will also be a reasonable punishment that would deter similar crimes, which could potentially devastate a large number of people, and can improve human's communal life.

Homosexuality, Once Again, Highlights the Contrast Between the Traditional Version of Islam and the Quranic View

بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

أَتَأْتُونَ الذُّكْرَانَ مِنَ الْعَالَمِينَ

" Do you approach males among the worlds" 26:165

وَتَذَرُونَ مَا خَلَقَ لَكُمْ رَبُّكُم مِّنْ أَزْوَاجِكُم ۚ بَلْ أَنتُمْ قَوْمٌ عَاد

"And leave what your Lord has created for you as mates?
 But you are a people transgressing." 26-166

وَأَمْطَرْنَا عَلَيْهِم مَّطَرًا ۖ فَسَاءَ مَطَرُ الْمُنذَرِينَ

"And We rained upon them a rain [of stones], and evil was the rain of those who were warned."173

أَئِنَّكُمْ لَتَأْتُونَ الرِّجَالَ شَهْوَةً مِّن دُونِ النِّسَاءِ ۚ بَلْ أَنتُمْ قَوْمٌ تَجْهَلُونَ

"Do you indeed approach men with desire instead 

of women? Rather, you are a people behaving ignorantly."27-55

إِنَّكُمْ لَتَأْتُونَ الرِّجَالَ شَهْوَةً مِّن دُونِ النِّسَاءِ ۚ بَلْ أَنتُمْ قَوْمٌ مُّسْرِفُونَ

Indeed, you approach men with desire,"  
7-81 "instead of women. Rather, you are a transgressing people.

صدق الله العلي العظيم

from Quran.com with Sahiheh Int. translation

In the above verses God directly addresses the topic of homosexuality. There might be more verses that I have not found besides 29:28-34 in which God referrers to the Lot and his people. 

From these wordings it is clear that God explicitly forbids men from using other men instead of women as the people of "Lot" did. Consequently, they were punished and wiped out of the earth by divine retribution. 

The important lesson to learn for our time, is the fact that according to these verses God does not order his prophet of the time (Lot or Abraham) to go and fight them or to stop them by any means they could.  It is left to God to deal with them in anyway necessary.  This is the lesson we should learn from Quran. That is, in many cases such as homosexuality despite being strictly forbidden, we are not to harm the doer's of such actions or prevent them doing so by force.   

This is one of the many occasions when the Quranic view is not supporting the traditional Islamic punishment system which are mostly derived from "Hadith"(The bonafide wordings of the prophet) or "Sunna"(The way prophet acted upon different situations).   The contrast between the Quran's position, which is leaving such sinful actions to God, with sever punishments imposed in Islamic tradition seems to be of immense significance since there are examples for which "Sharia" laws do not make sense in our age, to say the least. 

That is not to say we should totally abandon "Hadith" and deprive ourselves from the precious teachings of our dear "Prophet Mohammad", but rather we should not hold them as sacredly as Quran which instructs us to hear all the ideas and choose the best (39-18).

"Who listen to speech and follow the best of it. Those are the ones Allah has guided, and those are people of understanding."

In this manner we can open-mindedly look at Prophet's tradition and learn from what he did or said bearing in mind that all prophet's wordings and actions (except for Quran) have meant for the time of the prophet and the specific circumferences of the time. Obviously, our time requires different measures and different lifestyle compared to 1400 years ego.  

I however, strongly believe that content of Quran is universally applicable and true while the "Hadith" and tradition of Islam are certainly limited in their scope of time and context. If the tradition of Islam, as unfolded at time of prophet, was supposed to be held true for all times then Quran should have included all those laws in details.  Whereas in reality, Quran has contained eternally true principals and universally comprehensible concepts leaving the details to humans to work out as deemed most suitable for the specific conditions they are living in.  This could potentially be one of the main reasons God has clearly stated that he will protect Quran himself (15-9), which is needless to prove that is very much the case.

It might seem an unsupported statement at this stage, but it appears to me (once again here) that Quranic version of Islam is very much viable all over the world while the traditional Islam may not.   I understand that even in Quran there are some punishments that seem inappropriate for our time, yet, the fact of the matter is they are set so meticulously that if we consider their subtle conditions seriously these punishments make perfect sense.  I will discuss them one by one over the future posts.

One of the unnoticed delicacies is the fact that Quran never instructs the believers to interfere in other people's life in order to implement God's commands unless someone is being hurt physically, emotionally and/or financially.  Otherwise, no mater how sever one's wrong doing is, it is only left to God to deal with him. That is, the prophet or the righteous have nothing to do in such cases except for reminding the wrong doers of what they are doing and invite them to the right path.

Finally, I believe it is time for Muslims to believe that: it is possible to truly love God and his greatest messenger, to have a Quranic life in modern time and at the same time use their logic and reason to handle their worldly affairs in line with God's satisfaction (to the best of their collective understanding) looking to the future instead of past in order to live happily and peacefully with the rest of the world.    

Consciousness in Quran

بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

اللَّـهُ يَتَوَفَّى الْأَنْفُسَ حِينَ مَوْتِهَا وَالَّتِي لَمْ تَمُتْ فِي مَنَامِهَا ۖ فَيُمْسِكُ الَّتِي قَضَىٰ عَلَيْهَا الْمَوْتَ وَيُرْسِلُ الْأُخْرَىٰ إِلَىٰ أَجَلٍ مُسَمًّى ۚ إِنَّ فِي ذَٰلِكَ لَآيَاتٍ لِقَوْمٍ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ

"Allah takes the souls at the time of their death, and those that do not die [He takes] during their sleep. Then He keeps those for which He has decreed death and releases the others for a specified term. Indeed in that are signs for a people who give thought." 39:42

صدق الله العلي العظيم

In a previous post this verse was mentioned when attempting to put pieces of information together in order to find out human's nature described in Quran as "Nafs".  Yet this single "Ayeh" provides us with invaluable clues on one of the most complicated problems in metaphysics, that is how our soul ( Nafs in Quran or mind/ conscientiousness in philosophy) is related to our body.  

Generally speaking, the nature of interaction between the metaphysical side of the world and the material side appears to have always been a dead end in human's intellectual endeavor throughout the history especially in today's heated discussions around the subject of mind-body problem.  I believe it is one of the secrets of the world that we would not be able to figure out without God's guidance. 

Please note that I do not claim that Quran has given a clear explanation on this challenging question (or any other) but rather, it provides sings to be followed by personal inspiration which can lead us to a new insight on how the world works as a whole. Therefore, any understanding we may reach will, like always, be a fallible human attempt toward seeing the ultimate truth of the world and as such is inevitably relative and uncertain.  Theoretically, it might be basically impossible for us as an infinitesimal member of the cosmos to acquire a comprehensive view of the whole world (material and immaterial section combined).                                                

That said, what is explicitly stated in the above verse of Quran is: when we die God takes away our soul and if we are sleeping and not dead our soul is separated but it will be return to the body if our time of death has not come yet.  And what we can infer is: 

A dead body and a asleep body they both lack consciousness and since Quran says God takes away your "Nafs" when we are asleep or dead, we can therefore, claim "Nafs" has the same meaning as consciousness which are equivalent to soul or mind. The is why I will use these words interchangeably. 

We can also note that every time we go to sleep our soul is separated from our body according to Quran. This is very interesting as the traditional view might be we only lose our soul once we die. Moreover, it shows that our physical body can be biologically alive (in sleeping state) while its soul is away. This would mean that although being conscious is not a necessary condition for being alive biologically, it is essential to be a human functionally. 

Above all, this verse proves that our identity, our personality or what make us a human in general sense, is in fact our "Nafs" ( our consciousness, soul or mind) without which no lover will have any feeling for a dead body or for an unconscious body long asleep. 

Furthermore, as we ,most of the time, have similar experiences of happy, sad, fearful feelings while sleeping, due to the events happening in our dream, we can deduce that our soul can, independent of our body, experience mental states and at the same time reflects them on the asleep body either in terms of a brain activity and/or in form of moving parts of our body.  That is to say, as result of a scary situation that we are perceiving in our dream we see our self screaming out of fear and feel as if our heart is squeezed. At the same time these feelings are reflected on our body which is seemingly asleep and unconscious.  Consequently, we may suddenly wake up to find our-self actually screaming or moving a leg with our heart pounding.

Another reason that may show our soul can learn and experience autonomously is when we dream our-self in a situation that is in line with our wishes and desires (which are of immaterial nature) projected onto a future event, something that we wish to happen or it can be a completely unexpected circumstances.  In such cases, we never hesitate the authenticity of our experience while dreaming because we live these experiences as real as they can get in real (awaken) life.  As a matter of fact, these dreams can potentially have the same impact on us as any daily life experience we go through. 

It may be argued that our dreams are the result of some chemical activity in this and that specific location of the brain in the first place.  The counter argument would be firstly, the brain is always stimulated by the data (or neurons) it receives from the five senses namely sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste.  In the absence of any signal from the physical senses in sleeping, if the brain shows activity it has to be a reflection from mind actually or better say from the soul's independent journey. Secondly, the nature of human's perception including good, bad, right, wrong , thoughts and conceptions are in fact abstract and absolutely immaterial. This follows that no material interaction can lead beyond the physical world unless they have an impact (of unknown mechanism) on the immaterial mind which perceives them beyond the material domain.  This argument may refute the recent movement in philosophy in which the origin of all mental stats ( all feelings and thoughts) are merely the result of some biological process in the brain. 

This is not to say that our body does not have any effect on the soul (mind).  It certainly has as we may have a bad dream as result of a specific condition associated to our body as everyone has experienced this.  Soul and body clearly have a mutual interrelation.  Nevertheless, these physical impacts on our soul during sleep time account for only a small portion of our dreams.  Our mind (soul) seems to be working nonstop as our thinking state continues while we are sleeping. 

There are also many other physical experiences in our daily life that have noticeable effect on our soul such as eating, physical contact with others and so on.  In fact, what Quran pictures for us is we actually shape our "Nafs" (soul or mind) through these worldly actions considering the fact that whatever we do will affect our soul permanently.  The point however, is that it is the soul that has the superiority over the body and is our identity, our self and our humanity.  It is also our soul that is independent of the material world and will ultimately survive our physical death.  To some extent, the association of a soul to a body can be regarded as a driver to a car. 

We can further understand that when we sleep and we lose our consciousness, our body takes a rest and feels refreshed after waking up. This tells us when the soul is engaged with our body it physically exhausts our body. Hence the body needs to take a break from this connection. Perhaps, we can say that the biological body can not contain the soul for as unlimited time as we can understand from our sleeping pattern.  This time limit for the soul and body entanglement might actually be a valuable clue in understanding the mechanism by which the two sides affect one another. 

Probably, this discussion gives rise to more questions than it answers concerning soul-body interaction over sleeping time such as what happens in "sleep-walking", in the medical condition "coma" or when we are chemically put to sleep for a surgery. I hope we can look into them in future

Finally, I do admit that, at this stage, we are still in dark as to how exactly the soul (mind) interact with our body which boils down to the interaction of mind with cells, molecules, atoms and .... . At least, we now know where to focus and on what question exactly we need God's intervention.